Template talk:Game Boy: Difference between revisions

From Data Crystal
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


::Oh, ok. Thank you. --[[User:AnyoneEB|AnyoneEB]] 21:59, 5 February 2006 (EST)
::Oh, ok. Thank you. --[[User:AnyoneEB|AnyoneEB]] 21:59, 5 February 2006 (EST)
:::Speaking of which, I don't get enough credit for what I do here. I've made all of the templates and cleaned up alot of articles. I should be an admin. ;) hehe. --[[User:TheEmulatorGuy|TheEmulatorGuy]] 22:05, 5 February 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 03:05, 6 February 2006

More fields

This needs more info like the NES and SNES ones. --AnyoneEB 21:12, 29 January 2006 (EST)

Yes, it does. I attempted to do some research a while ago but I couldn't find much. I will try again. --TheEmulatorGuy

GBC?

Would GBC support be an appropriate field? The options would none (ex. Super Mario Land 1), limited (ex. Pokemon Red/Blue), full (don't know of any), or exclusive (any black cartridge game; does not work on regular GameBoy... I think). --AnyoneEB 09:58, 5 February 2006 (EST)

No. The "type" field is complete appropriate. If it's a black and white game, it is "Grayscale Spiel", while limited support for color is "Grayscale with GBC Features", etc. This kind of information is stored in the ROM header and therefore we do not need a seperate field for it. --TheEmulatorGuy 14:42, 5 February 2006 (EST)
Oh, ok. Thank you. --AnyoneEB 21:59, 5 February 2006 (EST)
Speaking of which, I don't get enough credit for what I do here. I've made all of the templates and cleaned up alot of articles. I should be an admin. ;) hehe. --TheEmulatorGuy 22:05, 5 February 2006 (EST)