If you are still using the old URL (datacrystal.romhacking.net), please update your bookmarks! The old URL may stop working soon.
The current URL is datacrystal.tcrf.net.
The current URL is datacrystal.tcrf.net.
Talk:ROM map: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→iNES-centric?: addressing clarification) |
m (moved Talk:ROM Map to Talk:ROM map over redirect) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This guideline assumes that all ROM files are in [[iNES]] format, right? What should be done in UNIF for PRG chunks that don't start at fixed positions? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 17:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | This guideline assumes that all ROM files are in [[iNES]] format, right? What should be done in UNIF for PRG chunks that don't start at fixed positions? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 17:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
:I suppose that is not really quite right. I think it is more proper to say that addresses as the system sees them would be best, but the only real requirement is that the page makes it clear which addressing scheme is being used. --[[User:AnyoneEB|AnyoneEB]] 13:59, 25 June 2006 (EDT) | :I suppose that is not really quite right. I think it is more proper to say that addresses as the system sees them would be best, but the only real requirement is that the page makes it clear which addressing scheme is being used. --[[User:AnyoneEB|AnyoneEB]] 13:59, 25 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
::Personally, I don't think there's anything to worry about, as I can't see Datacrystal getting much data in the UNIF addressing scheme. UNIF just isn't prevalent enough. --[[User:Dan|Dan]] 04:00, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 30 August 2011
iNES-centric?
"All addresses are raw hex format, that is, within the ROM file, not as the system sees it."
This guideline assumes that all ROM files are in iNES format, right? What should be done in UNIF for PRG chunks that don't start at fixed positions? --Tepples 17:15, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
- I suppose that is not really quite right. I think it is more proper to say that addresses as the system sees them would be best, but the only real requirement is that the page makes it clear which addressing scheme is being used. --AnyoneEB 13:59, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
- Personally, I don't think there's anything to worry about, as I can't see Datacrystal getting much data in the UNIF addressing scheme. UNIF just isn't prevalent enough. --Dan 04:00, 26 June 2006 (EDT)